Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation
The Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation (KDA) is a quantitative tactical strategy developed by Ilya Kipnis, a quantitative analyst and blogger at QuantStrat TradeR. KDA blends Wouter Keller and Adam Butler's Adaptive Asset Allocation (AAA) framework with the crash-protection concepts from Keller's Protective Asset Allocation research. The result is a strategy that selects assets based on momentum and volatility-adjusted scoring while maintaining a defensive overlay to reduce risky exposure when market conditions deteriorate.
Investment Philosophy
KDA is built on the premise that momentum and volatility-based signals can identify the strongest-performing asset classes while simultaneously avoiding those in distress. The Adaptive Asset Allocation component ranks assets by a combination of momentum and inverse volatility, allocating more to assets with strong recent performance and lower risk. The defensive layer adds a market-breadth signal: when a significant number of risky assets are in downtrends, the portfolio rotates toward safe assets such as short-term bonds or cash. The combination aims to capture momentum-driven returns while providing a meaningful crash-avoidance mechanism. A related strategy from Keller's research also available on this site is Vigilant Asset Allocation G12.
Who It's For
KDA suits sophisticated, self-directed investors who are comfortable implementing and monitoring a quantitative, rules-based strategy with monthly rebalancing. It requires access to momentum and volatility data across a defined universe of asset classes and a willingness to follow signals mechanically even during periods of model underperformance.
Pros
- Combines momentum ranking with volatility-adjusted weighting for a more nuanced asset selection process
- Defensive overlay provides crash protection by rotating to safe assets when the risky asset universe is broadly weak
- Systematic and rules-based, removing emotional bias from allocation decisions
Cons
- Complex to implement relative to static portfolios -- requires ongoing computation of momentum and volatility metrics
- Whipsaw risk in oscillating markets can generate losses when signals frequently reverse
- Strategy involves multiple interacting parameters that may not perform as expected in future market regimes
Technical Notes
The strategy is evaluated monthly. Asset selection draws on a universe typically including global equity indices, commodities, real estate, and bonds. The safe asset receives any weight not allocated to risky assets when the defensive filter is triggered.
We cover a curated selection of portfolios in this database.
workspace_premiumSee what's coveredCancel anytime. No lock-in.
Average Allocation
Based on historical average weights across all rebalance periods.
Performance Snapshot
Rolling Returns
| Period | Low | Average | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | -8.2% | +11.1% | +42.2% |
| 3 Year | -1.1% | +10.7% | +20.8% |
| 5 Year | +2.1% | +10.9% | +19.7% |
| 10 Year | +3.4% | +11.2% | +16.6% |
Growth of $10,000
Historical Drawdown
Percentage decline from the portfolio's peak value at each point in time.
Rolling Returns
Annualised return for each rolling period ending on that date.
Annualised return for each 1Y period ending on that date.