verifiedCurated Strategy
· 37 yr backtestTactical

Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation

Real CAGR11.0%
Max Drawdown-10.6%
Sharpe Ratio0.74

The Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation (KDA) is a quantitative tactical strategy developed by Ilya Kipnis, a quantitative analyst and blogger at QuantStrat TradeR. KDA blends Wouter Keller and Adam Butler's Adaptive Asset Allocation (AAA) framework with the crash-protection concepts from Keller's Protective Asset Allocation research. The result is a strategy that selects assets based on momentum and volatility-adjusted scoring while maintaining a defensive overlay to reduce risky exposure when market conditions deteriorate.

Investment Philosophy

KDA is built on the premise that momentum and volatility-based signals can identify the strongest-performing asset classes while simultaneously avoiding those in distress. The Adaptive Asset Allocation component ranks assets by a combination of momentum and inverse volatility, allocating more to assets with strong recent performance and lower risk. The defensive layer adds a market-breadth signal: when a significant number of risky assets are in downtrends, the portfolio rotates toward safe assets such as short-term bonds or cash. The combination aims to capture momentum-driven returns while providing a meaningful crash-avoidance mechanism. A related strategy from Keller's research also available on this site is Vigilant Asset Allocation G12.

Who It's For

KDA suits sophisticated, self-directed investors who are comfortable implementing and monitoring a quantitative, rules-based strategy with monthly rebalancing. It requires access to momentum and volatility data across a defined universe of asset classes and a willingness to follow signals mechanically even during periods of model underperformance.

Pros

  • Combines momentum ranking with volatility-adjusted weighting for a more nuanced asset selection process
  • Defensive overlay provides crash protection by rotating to safe assets when the risky asset universe is broadly weak
  • Systematic and rules-based, removing emotional bias from allocation decisions

Cons

  • Complex to implement relative to static portfolios -- requires ongoing computation of momentum and volatility metrics
  • Whipsaw risk in oscillating markets can generate losses when signals frequently reverse
  • Strategy involves multiple interacting parameters that may not perform as expected in future market regimes

Technical Notes

The strategy is evaluated monthly. Asset selection draws on a universe typically including global equity indices, commodities, real estate, and bonds. The safe asset receives any weight not allocated to risky assets when the defensive filter is triggered.

arrow_backBack to Database
mark_email_unreadMonthly signals for select portfolios

We cover a curated selection of portfolios in this database.

workspace_premiumSee what's covered

Cancel anytime. No lock-in.

Average Allocation

Based on historical average weights across all rebalance periods.

Monthly
Intermediate-Term Treasury Bond(IEF)27.1%
US Large-Cap Blend(SPY)14.6%
Cash(BIL)14.3%
US Real Estate(VNQ)8.3%
International Real Estate(RWX)5.8%
European Equity(VGK)5.7%
Broad Commodities(DBC)5.4%
Long-Term Treasury Bond(TLT)5.4%
Gold(GLD)5.2%
Emerging Markets Equity(EEM)5.1%
Japan Equity(EWJ)3.2%

Performance Snapshot

trending_upReal CAGR
10.97%
balanceSharpe Ratio
0.740
trending_downMax Drawdown
-10.55%
show_chartSortino Ratio
0.120
arrow_upwardBest Year
+42.2%
arrow_downwardWorst Year
-3.4%
update10-Year CAGR
5.87%
warningUlcer Index
3.01
analyticsUlcer Perf. Index
2.150
account_balanceGFC CAGR
+12.3%
computerDot-com CAGR
+11.5%
syncTrade Frequency
Monthly
shieldRisk Level
1/5 — Conservative
calendar_monthMin. Timeline
3 years
historyBacktest Period
37 years

Rolling Returns

PeriodLowAverageHigh
1 Year-8.2%+11.1%+42.2%
3 Year-1.1%+10.7%+20.8%
5 Year+2.1%+10.9%+19.7%
10 Year+3.4%+11.2%+16.6%
Compare to:

Growth of $10,000

Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation
Sharpe Ratio0.74
Best Year+42.2%
Worst Year-3.4%
Final Value$487,050

Historical Drawdown

Percentage decline from the portfolio's peak value at each point in time.

Rolling Returns

Annualised return for each rolling period ending on that date.

Annualised return for each 1Y period ending on that date.

Related Portfolios